#Games for power mac g5 64 Bit#
#Games for power mac g5 Pc#
#Games for power mac g5 mac#

#Games for power mac g5 mac#

I don't know what the wish is of any Mac fan or otherwise to cheerlead a 750 much faster than this. One question-and I ask because the 750 is a personally embarrassing chip to have as a computer CPU these days, worse still, as a gaming computer CPU-for what reason is anyone even considering a 2GHz 750FX? The last I kept up with the 750 line, the FX had halted at 900MHz, and it took the GX to make it to 1000MHz. Having the 'only' a 2 GHz 750 in the PowerMacs and the 2 GHz 750FX in the Xserve isn't a big deal in comparison.

While Apple's slow at picking up IBM's newest chips, IBM doesn't look like they'll hit 3 GHz by the time Jobs promised. Right now we're waiting for Apple with whatever the hold up is. The hold up on the new Macs with faster CPUs isn't IBMs fault, as cited, we've already seen the 750 FXs. Also the 750 (in some form) is going into the Xbox 2 as of right now. IBM is in the same speed race as everyone else, and just happen to be more apt to compete against the other big boys than Motorola. IBM makes its PPC CPUs for a lot of its servers and workstation boxes, its competing toe to toe with Intel, NEC and so forth at that level. That's a rathr peachy picture but IBM is competing with the market at large. I think that it is deffinatly possible to reach the 3ghz mark but it depends on what thier priority is.

#Games for power mac g5 64 Bit#

They have made the move to 64 bit processing and they are going to make it the standard of computing.

#Games for power mac g5 Pc#

They are still relitivly close to the speeds of a lot of the PC processors. If Apple just had commpitition like this you might see the faster clock speeds that everybody wants.Д«ut I mean even thought they don't have that competition that drive newer faster prouducts you have to give them credit. ON the PC side all the companies are trying to get faster clock speeds and faster prosessors every day. They can just chill and pump out processors at a pace that is ok with the Apple company. IBM doesn't have to work like a maniac to beat anyone because they don't have anyone to beat. On the mac there is only IBM and no one esle. YOu have all these companies compeateing against each other to get their processor into almost every home where there is a PC. In the case of processors you have Intel, AMD, and thoes other ones. In the case of PCs there are bunches of differen't companies that are competing to make there part the best. The thing is that even thought macs are computers because of the exclusivenes of the companies that makes the parts for macs there really isn't much compitition in that sense.

Linux is nice but it's always gonna be the indie OS.

I've used all those OS's so much and really only don't hate OSX. dammit, for gamming if you were a freak and bought every other game made). Apple/Mac/OSX is so much better in so many ways and as a whole when compared to Wintel machines or even non-OSX Unix machines i really can't recomend a PC to anyone for really any reason (except. The G4 days had some dry spots as well but the G5 is a head to toe muscle computer and as long as that remains, does it really matter which computer is 2fps more in Quake III than the next.ДЄs longs as it's pretty even the choice to me is so easy. Pre G4 macs were really such dogs for the longest time, and if you wanted to do 3D, prepare to get suicidal. To me i'm just glad apple (with IBM) is finally busting a move with constantly moving forward at the head of the pack with computer hardware. Sure you can go frankenstein your own computer with anything you can find but that's not really the issue. The vast majority of people have the option of AMD, P4 or Xeon (WIN), or a G5/4/3. Well it doesn't really much matter if some company makes some obscure 64biter that next to no one uses.